Evaluation

A questionnaire with multiple choice and open type questions for each activity and the whole project will be created.
By the end of the training workshop the participants will be asked to complete the questionnaire and help us improve and become better. In addition, a general report will have to be written by all participants so that we will be able to evaluate all training activities, as well as the meeting venue, the meals, the social events and generally all the logistics.

Moreover, under the Youthpass framework the participants will have the chance to self-evaluate the projects outcomes.
This will take place one month after the completion of the workshops, so that participants have distanced themselves from the educational process and thus will have a more realistic perception of their learning achievements. The questions to be answered will be related to the achievement of learning objectives, the learning of skills and personal development that occurred during the program.

Evaluation from Participants NOFEE

Here we will try to represent all the results from the evaluation. All the results are in percentage

The questionnaire is divided into 4 parts. The first part is for the food that we had in the camp, second part is for hospitality in the camp, 3^rd part is for learning activities which we want to be better in our organisation and 4^th part is for the whole project, for all activities that we had during the Training, Non Formal Environmental Education.

General Status

In the Training there were 7 males and 25 females

Age:

Less than 20: 3 participants

From 20 to 30: 17 participants

more than 30: 10 participants

Part A: Food and Restaurant of the apartments. Results in percentage

HS: Highly Satisfied, S: Satisfied, N: Neutral, U: Unsatisfied, HU: Highly Unsatisfied
Within your recent stay in Pissouri (Pissouriana appartments) please rate your overall satisfaction with:	HS	S	N	U	HU	MEAN
Quality of Food	61,8	38,2	0	0	0	1,38
Taste Of Food	67,6	32,4	0	0	0	1,32
Freshness of Food	67,6	29,4	2,9	0	0	1,35
Temperature of Food	61,8	35,3	2,9	0	0	1,41
Portion size	70,6	23,5	2,9	2,9	0	1,38
Quality of ingredients	64,7	32,4	2,9	0	0	1,38
Cooking of the food	73,5	26,5	0	0	0	1,26
Service from the kitchen	76,5	23,5	0	0	0	1,24

As we can see from the results all the participants were satisfied to highly satisfy from the food in the restaurant during the whole week. Pissouriana restaurant and our organisation make the best for the quality of the food. We have to thank Koulla (director of Pissouriana restaurant and apartments) for the whole organisation of the food in the restaurant. Many thanks to our chef for the whole preparation and for being so kind to all participants, she tried his best and he done all the appropriate for all the participants. We can see a characteristic graph about the answers of the participants which is dealing with food.

Part B: Accommodation, Hospitality and Facilities of the place in Pissouri. The results are in percentages

HS: Highly Satisfied, S: Satisfied, N: Neutral, U: Unsatisfied, HU: Highly Unsatisfied
Within your recent stay in Pissouri please rate your overall satisfaction with:	HS	S	N	U	HU	MEAN
Accommodation in the apartments	35,3	61,8	0	2,9	0	1,71
Place that you were sleeping	44,1	44,1	11,8	0	0	1,68
Electricity options in the apartments	38,2	44,1	14,7	2,9	0	1,82
Wifi in apartments	17,6	32,4	35,3	11,8	2,9	2,50
Restaurant	47,1	47,1	5,9	0	0	1,59
Working places	35,3	58,8	5,9	0	0	1,71
Cleanliness inside of restaurant	38,2	58,8	2,9	0	0	1,65
Cleanliness	32,4	38,2	23,5	5,9	0	2,03
Safety	67,6	32,4	0	0	0	1,32
Any problems with your visit? No problem report from any participants, just 2 participants tell us that it would be better if there was chocolate cereals in breakfast and also fruits and juice, as more water in all lunches in restaurant.

As we can see from the above results all the participants were satisfied to highly satisfy with their accommodation. One or maybe 2 different answers is physical to a training exchange of 30 people. Pissouriana apartments was the perfect place for this training. Some participants were disappointed with wifi connection probably in venue were all activities were done. We had decided before that we will not have wifi in the venue so all participants to participate in activities. Wifi was all the time open in our free time in Pissouriana apartments. The graph of the answers of participants about internet connection it follows).

Part C: Learning Activities

C1: Global Warming, Ecological Footprint (Tuesday Wednesday)

In this part the participants evaluated the activities that are being during the Training. First part is for Global Warming and the main presenter was Dr George Zittis (youth leader from Cyprus, climatologist). The results for these activities are showed in the following tables

Please state the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements, where 1 is strongly Agree and 5 is strongly Disagree (tick one per statement). Results are on percentage

ABOUT THE PRESENTER

Q1.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The presenter communicated the information clearly.	64,7	20,6	14,7	0	0	1,50
The presenter made the subject matter compelling.	70,6	14,7	14,7	0	0	1,44
The presented was able to answer questions.	73,5	11,8	8,8	5,9	0	1,47

ABOUT THE PRESENTATION

Q2.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The workshop was relevant to me.	47,1	29,4	23,5	0	0	1,76
The workshop was interesting.	52,9	29,4	11,8	5,9	0	1,71
The workshop met my purpose in attending.	44,1	44,1	11,8	0	0	1,68
The workshop motivated me to take action.	44,1	29,4	26,5	0	0	1,82
I want to tell others about what was presented.	58,8	17,6	23,5	0	0	1,65
The handouts/supporting material were useful.	54,5	27,3	12,1	6,1	0	1,70
I have the confidence to use the knowledge gained from the workshop in my life.	38,2	41,2	20,6	0	0	1,82

ABOUT THE WORKSHOP IN GENERAL

Q3.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The venue was conveniently located.	58,8	23,5	11,8	5,9	0	1,65
The duration of the workshop was right for me.	58,8	20,6	14,7	5,9	0	1,68
The workshop was well organised.	52,9	29,4	11,8	5,9	0	1,76
The working method was excellent	47,1	35,3	11,8	5,9	0	1,76

Q.4. What was the best aspect of the workshop? We had the following answers from participants

Co – operating among participants
All the group members where actively taking part
Group work very inclusive and good global warming presentation
I realize that my life is not so good about my ecological footprint
The neutrality of the presenter
The freedom to choose your materials and arguments
I really liked that they were 2 opinions about climate change (2 videos) ! very interesting
Awareness about my activities and how they impact in my footprint
It has all the kinds of the activities
The debate and the exchange of the ideas
Learn about my footprint
Working in groups
The debate
We got to learn our ecological footprint
I realize how much i waste and how big is my footprint
That is actually provided useful information’s

Q. 5 What aspect of the workshop needs improvement?

We had the following answers from participants:

Time management
Explain more in details
More specific information’s
A lot of gaming in these themes but not a lot of information’s
The discussions could have been more interesting if more people were including and if they express their problems
All the participants must participate, it wasn’t mistake of the presenter but different participants were unrespectfull (times, activities, working groups)
Technique hot to calculate our footprint
Better description of the activities so to include more participants
More non formal methods
The foot print calculation process needs further discussion afterwards
A bit more organisation
More discussion about education and environmental educational methods
It has to be presented in a more interesting way so to had the attention of more participants
Mixing groups
Discipline

C2: Creating, Building, Finalizing, Representing my Green Company or my Green Youth Project (Whole week)

In this part the participants evaluated the activities that are being during the Training. Second part is for entrepreneurship and creativity in Green Companies or Projects. The main presenter was Mr Nikolas Nikolaou (General Youth leader from Cyprus, Physics teacher). The results in percentages for these activities are showed in the following tables

Please state the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements, where 1 is strongly Agree and 5 is strongly Disagree (tick one per statement).

ABOUT THE PRESENTER

Q1.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The presenter communicated the information clearly.	64,7	23,5	11,8	0	0	1,47
The presenter made the subject matter compelling.	67,6	20,6	11,8	0	0	1,44
The presented was able to answer questions.	76,5	17,6	5,9	0	0	1,29

ABOUT THE PRESENTATION

Q2.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The workshop was relevant to me.	67,6	17,6	14,7	0	0	1,47
The workshop was interesting.	73,5	17,6	8,8	0	0	1,35
The workshop met my purpose in attending.	52,9	38,2	8,8	0	0	1,56
The workshop motivated me to take action.	61,8	20,6	17,6	0	0	1,56
I want to tell others about what was presented.	70,6	14,7	14,7	0	0	1,44
The handouts/supporting material were useful.	66,7	18,2	12,1	3,0	0	1,52
I have the confidence to use the knowledge gained from the workshop in my life.	55,9	26,5	17,6	0	0	1,62

ABOUT THE WORKSHOP IN GENERAL

Q3.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The venue was conveniently located.	67,6	20,6	11,8	0	0	1,44
The duration of the workshop was right for me.	70,6	17,6	11,8	0	0	1,41
The workshop was well organised.	58,8	26,5	14,7	0	0	1,56
The working method was excellent	58,8	20,6	20,6	0	0	1,62

Q.4. What was the best aspect of the workshop?

We had the following answers from participants

Good people with great ideas
Enough time to create to think
Everything was great
The final presentations
The feel that you realize that the whole project is reality
It made us actually get very involved
The team work
The freedom in developing the ideas
Collecting many ideas of the beginning was really good
Many people together can find great ideas
The possibility to think as a real green company
That all ideas got accepted
That we can do something if we want to do
My team and our organisation tat we will create
Thinking about the many details that we need to create our company
Innovation of the people, exchanging ideas
I will do it in groups in my school
I had to think new innovating and creative ideas
The team
Getting to work with other participants
Creativity and funny
Many ideas
Many companies
Interesting to see so many good ideas
That we can be creative

Q. 5 What aspect of the workshop needs improvement?

We had the following answers from participants:

Make aged mixed groups
There would be more information’s of what ideas are reality, how much money you will need and realize the project
Too much time and the time for the presentations the results it could be longer
Skipping the last session a lot of paper work about finance and all these, but at the end was really good
Too many questions and work for building the company
Explanation of the idea
Is better to start not the first day of the training
Some questions in all three sessions were the same don’t need to repeat them
Making sure that the groups are properly working together
More information’s in the topic or maybe a supervisor
Clearer and more concrete instructions
Mixing groups

C3: Let Every Voice to be heard (Wednesday), Cyprus Island, Living in a perfect world (Thursday), Front Page (Friday) and Take a Step Forward (Saturday)

In this part the participants evaluated the activities that are being during the Youth Exchange. Second part is for Let Every Voice to be heard, Cyprus Island, Living in a perfect world, Front Page and Take a Step Forward. The main presenter was Mr Nikolas Nikolaou (General Youth leader from Cyprus, Physics teacher). The results in percentages for these activities are showed in the following tables

Please state the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements, where 1 is strongly Agree and 5 is strongly Disagree (tick one per statement).

ABOUT THE PRESENTER

Q1.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The presenter communicated the information clearly.	67,6	26,5	5,9	0	0	1,38
The presenter made the subject matter compelling.	73,5	23,5	2,9	0	0	1,29
The presented was able to answer questions.	70,6	20,6	8,8	0	0	1,38

ABOUT THE PRESENTATION

Q2.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The workshop was relevant to me.	55,9	35,3	8,8	0	0	1,53
The workshop was interesting.	64,7	23,5	11,8	0	0	1,47
The workshop met my purpose in attending.	64,7	29,4	5,9	0	0	1,41
The workshop motivated me to take action.	52,9	32,4	14,7	0	0	1,62
I want to tell others about what was presented.	58,8	32,4	5,9	0	0	1,50
The handouts/supporting material were useful.	61,8	32,4	5,9	0	0	1,44
I have the confidence to use the knowledge gained from the workshop in my life.	55,9	38,2	5,9	0	0	1,50

ABOUT THE WORKSHOP IN GENERAL

Q3.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The venue was conveniently located.	64,7	23,5	11,8	0	0	1,47
The duration of the workshop was right for me.	73,5	11,8	14,7	0	0	1,41
The workshop was well organised.	64,7	26,5	8,8	0	0	1,44
The working method was excellent	55,9	26,5	17,6	0	0	1,62

Q.4. What was the best aspect of the workshop?

Very good ideas (Cyprus island, Front page)
I loved take a step forward, i find also many differences in educational systems
Front page activity was fun
Take one step forward made us think about other people
The team work and the freedom of developing the ideas
We learned a lot about Cyprus and its nature, i loved working at the beach
I loved the game Cyprus island
Comparing situation in different countries, different social conditions
To get know something really about Cyprus, Cyprus island was amazing
Using thought and our mind to find renewable energy sources (RES) for a larger community (Cyprus island)
We learn to make ourselves land projects in RES (Cyprus island)
Front page was the best
Learning about things didn’t knew before (Cyprus island)
Creativity and knowledge
The role game (Take a step forward, Cyprus island, Front page)
Working with other participants in a creative way
Nicely performed by the presenter
I really enjoyed the Cyprus island game

Q. 5 What aspect of the workshop needs improvement?

We had the following answers from participants:

Motivation for participating
Front page was funny and we didn’t gave the attention that we had too (no much time)
In let every voice to be heard not everyone could speak (more time for discussion). The debate was dominated by certain people (better sharing of the time)
Take a step forward we need more time to imagine and get into the role
Peoples group working skills (Let every voice to be Heard)
Mixing groups
More time or a target for only 2 countries participants in each group so that can explain the situation properly (Let every voice to be heard)

C4: Debate – Monoculture vs. Organic Farming, Web of life (Tuesday), the biodiversity of life (Friday and Saturday), Environmental Exchange Box (Saturday)

In this part the participants evaluated the activities that are being during the Youth Exchange. Second part is for Debate – Monoculture vs Organic Farming, Web of life, the biodiversity of life, Environmental Exchange Box. The main presenter was Mrs Magdalena Szewczyk (Youth leader from Poland, Biology teacher). The results in percentages for these activities are showed in the following tables

Please state the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements, where 1 is strongly Agree and 5 is strongly Disagree (tick one per statement).

ABOUT THE PRESENTER

Q1.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The presenter communicated the information clearly.	58,8	26,5	8,8	5,9	0	1,62
The presenter made the subject matter compelling.	55,9	29,4	14,7	0	0	1,59
The presented was able to answer questions.	67,6	26,5	5,9	0	0	1,38

ABOUT THE PRESENTATION

Q2.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The workshop was relevant to me.	52,9	32,4	8,8	5,9	0	1,68
The workshop was interesting.	55,9	32,4	8,8	2,9	0	1,59
The workshop met my purpose in attending.	55,9	26,4	14,7	2,9	0	1,65
The workshop motivated me to take action.	58,8	26,5	14,7	0	0	1,56
I want to tell others about what was presented.	52,9	35,3	8,8	2,9	0	1,62
The handouts/supporting material were useful.	57,6	27,3	12,1	3,0	0	1,61
I have the confidence to use the knowledge gained from the workshop in my life.	55,9	32,4	5,9	5,9	0	1,62

ABOUT THE WORKSHOP IN GENERAL

Q3.	SA				SD
	1	2	3	4	5	MEAN
The venue was conveniently located.	73,5	14,7	11,9	0	0	1,38
The duration of the workshop was right for me.	30,6	17,6	11,8	0	0	1,41
The workshop was well organised.	61,8	26,5	11,8	0	0	1,50
The working method was excellent	55,9	20,6	23,5	0	0	1,68

Q.4. What was the best aspect of the workshop?

Good and necessary topic to discuss
Web of life i loved it
Environmental exchange box was great
Monoculture vs organic farming i got the chance to moderate and it was really an interesting experience
I like the debate between monoculture vs organic farming and the environmental exchange box
Usefull information for school
Web of life was amazing
Debate in different roles
Box idea is clevel and promotes unity
I quite liked the debate and the visit to the farm
Exchange box great idea
Debating role playing
There was space for innovation and creativity

Q. 5 What aspect of the workshop needs improvement?

We had the following answers from participants:

The level of difficulty, really difficult, more explanation
Monoculture vs organic farmer was really difficult, too high level, the people didn’t knew, the level was high
The web of life was confusing and there was no wrapping up the activity
Group working skills
Monoculture vs organic should explained better, only few participants knew about them and it was difficult to get into the group
Debate – more informations in the topic it was difficult to understand
The issue of biodiversity was not so clear
The definitions of some words need to be explained before the activities
The way that the debate was handled

Part D: Program of Youth Exchange.

Here you will say your satisfaction about all the activities that took place in Youth Exchange (learning activities, intercultural activities, place of activities, place of the Camp, whole organisation of Youth Exchange).

Here the participants answer and evaluate all the actions, all the activities and general all the aspects of the Youth Exchanges. The answers are in percentage for each answer that participant gave.

HS: Highly Satisfied, S: Satisfied, N: Neutral, U: Unsatisfied, HU: Highly Unsatisfied
Within your recent stay in the Camp please rate your overall satisfaction with:	HS	S	N	U	HU	MEAN
Activity1: Green Energy and entrepreneurship	61,8	32,4	5,9	0	0	1,44
Activity 2: Creating my Green Company or Green Youth Project 1	55,9	35,3	8,8	0	0	1,53
Activity 3: Building my Green Company or Green Youth Project 2	55,9	38,2	5,9	0	0	1,50
Activity 4: Finalizing my Green Company or Green Youth Project 3	61,8	17,6	11,8	8,8	0	1,68
Activity 5: Representing my Green Company or Green Youth Project 4	76,5	20,6	2,96	0	0	1,26
Activity 6: Calculate your personal ecological footprint	70,6	17,6	11,8	0	0	1,41
Activity 7: Debate – Monoculture vs. Organic Farming	47,6	11,8	26,5	11,8	2,9	2,12
Activity 8: Web of life	64,7	14,7	14,7	5,9	0	1,62
Activity 9: Let Every Voice to Be Heard	47,1	23,5	23,5	2,9	0	1,85
Activity 10: Global Warming: Reality or Fake?	67,6	26,5	5,9	0	0	1,38
Activity 11: Cyprus Island: Year 39 after the Energy Destruction	70,6	17,6	11,8	0	3	1,41
Activity 12: Living in a perfect world	50,0	38,5	11,5	0	0	1,62
Activity 13: Front Page: From Local to Global. We care about Environment.	50,0	38,5	11,5	0	0	1,62
Activity 14: The Biodiversity of Life: Exploring the Outdoors Outside Activity, to Kourion	85,3	5,9	8,8	0	0	1,24
Activity 15: Take a Step forward	61,8	32,4	5,9	0	0	1,44
Activity 16: Environmental Exchange Box	61,8	14,7	20,8	2,9	0	1,65
Activity 17: The Biodiversity of Life: Exploring the Outdoors (visit of a farm in Pissouri)	87,9	6,1	6,1	0	0	1,18
Activity 18: Acting about environment	50,0	41,2	8,8	0	0	1,59
Activity 19: Youth Pass	43,3	43,3	13,3	0	0	1,70
Night Activities 1: Welcoming (Monday)	79,4	11,8	8,,8	0	0	1,29
Night Activities 2: Cyprus Night (Tuesday)	93,9	6,1	0	0	0	1,06
Night Activities 3: Organisations night (Wednesday)	79,4	14,7	5,9	0	0	1,26
Night Activities 4: Intercultural night (Thursday)	79,4	20,6	0	0	0	1,21
Places (Venues) of the Activities	70,6	23,5	5,9	0	0	1,35
Presentation and whole time management of the Activities	55,9	32,4	11,8	0	0	1,56
Place of the Training (Pissouriana Apartments)	70,6	26,5	2,9	0	0	1,32
Hospitality of Hosting Organisation (Cultural Association NOSTOS Pissouriou)	85,3	14,7	0	0	0	1,15
Organisation of the Whole Training	67,2	32,4	0	0	0	1,32

As you can see from the results all the participants were Highly satisfy with the hosting organisation, with the place, the whole organisation of NOFEE. Also we can see that they were also highly satisfied with all night activities especially Cyprus night and International night. The only activity were the mean number was above 2 was Debate – Monoculture vs. Organic Farming that means they didn’t like it as much as they like all the others activities. 10 graphs are following with the answers of the participants in questions with high evaluation.

Which activity did you like most of all?

In this question we had a lot of answers, but the most popular activities were:

Creating – building – finalizing and representing green company or green project with a lot of difference between the other activities more than 12 participants like it more than all the others
Exploring the outdoors, visiting a farm
Calculate your ecological foot print
Cyprus island 39 years after the energy destruction

Which activity did you like less of all?

Also In this question we had a lot of answers, but the activities that they don’t like them were:

Debate monoculture vs organic farmers , was the activity that liked less in participants with big difference from the others
Let every voice to be heard
Web of life

Which activity was mean full? (a lot of things that you thought and you like it)

Also In this question we had a lot of answers, but the activities that they like them more and they were more meaning full for the participants were:

Creating – building – finalizing and representing green company or green project was the activity with a lot of meening for a lot of participants with big difference from the others
Take a step forward
Cyprus island 39 years after the energy destruction
Calculate your ecological foot print

Which activity was mean less? (nothing to thing and you didn’t like it)

Also In this question we had a lot of answers, but the activities that they don’t like them and they were less meaning full for the participants were:

Debate monoculture vs organic farmers was the activity with the less meaning for the most participants

As we can see from the above result the most popular activity was Creating – building – finalizing and representing green company or green project and it was the activity with a lot of meanings. Is remarkable also that Cyprus island, 39 years after the Great Energy Destruction was popular to a lot of answers that means that it was the most discussable activity of the whole organisation.